In my dissertation companion course
I was asked to assist with further defining the term
“innovative.” “What does this word really mean, and how might it apply to
finding innovative research topics to study?” At first glance, defining
the word “innovative” seemed like a “no-brainer.” As I strived however, to
complete the assignment and consider my dissertation topic, it has turned into
a job for a “big-brainer.” For some reason, technology and the state of being
innovative seem to go hand-in hand, but I am questioning whether it really has
to go hand-in-hand.
On my journey toward gaining a
better understanding of the term “innovative,” I came across a Disney blog. In the blog, Tom Staggs (2011) conducted an interview with
Jeff Kober in discussing the organizations perspective of the term
“innovative.” In the interview Kober stated
Just as everyone
is responsible for safety, courtesy, show and efficiency, we should always be
trying to discover new ways to challenge the status quo, be more efficient, and
to surprise and delight our Guests at every turn. We often talk about
innovation in terms of technology. But innovation goes beyond technology and
should extend to everything we do. Regardless of our roles, each of us has the
opportunity to innovate and improve on what we do and how we do it” (par.3).
I know that this source may not be
scholarly but from my prospective, it provided a simple yet complex
understanding of term “innovative.” Essentially, what I have gleaned from this
statement is that being “innovative” is not just results oriented, it is also
contextual. Consequently, this could very well mean that what is innovative in
one context, may be old news or irrelevant in another context.
Considering the term “something”
which is a component of the Walden definition, I suggest a more specific
identification of this term. Utilizing the term “something” from my
perspective, naturally leads to a “product” only perspective of being
“innovative.” The U.S. Department of Education also discussed innovation in terms of product and processes.
I therefore suggest specifically identifying the “something” as a “product,
process, or approach”
Innovative:
- old product, process, or approach used in a contextually appropriate new way
- new product, process, or approach used in a contextually appropriate old way
- new product, process, or approach used in a contextually appropriate new way
My interest is with
regard to the pre-service early educator’s emotional intelligence. As I am
gaining familiarity with the concept of metacognition especially as it relates
to emotional intelligence, my interest leans with that topic as well. My question
(for right now anyway) is what difference does a phone call from the online
instructor to the online student make as means of formative feedback with
regard to the development of metacognitive skills? Many of the community
college students I work with take primarily online courses and unfortunately a
good portion of those students lack in the necessary emotional and
metacognition skills needed in order to be an effective early educator. For
some of those students, the only time that the instructor hears their voice is
if there is a problem, or at graduation. I wonder if having scheduled
instructor initiated phone calls throughout the semester would assist with the
development of metacognition skills.
In terms of my revised
definition of “innovative”, this dissertation topic idea would align with an
old product, process, or approach used in a contextually
appropriate new way
References
Staggs,T. (2011, December 5). Staggs: What does it mean to
be innovative? - Disney at work . Retrieved January 4, 2014, from
http://disneyatwork.com/2011/12/staggs-what-does-it-mean-to-be-innovative/
U.S. Department of Education. (2004,
December 6).
Retrieved January 4, 2014, from
http://www2.ed.gov/about/offices/list/oii/about/definition.html